Quinell Feder
Nussbaum
created a list of all capabilities necessary for a good human life. This does not
mean merely existing; this means a life of fulfillment and happiness. She
clearly states that not all of these capabilities must be practiced, but a human
must have the opportunity to exercise these capacities. The human must choose
which capabilities they want to exercise that would be beneficial to their life
and well being. These capabilities are life, bodily health, bodily integrity, senses,
imagination, thought, emotions, practical reason, affiliation, other species, play
and control over one’s environment.
I agree that all people universally should
have access to these 10 capabilities that she lists. Although this becomes much
more difficult when you consider non-westernized cultures who practice
different religions, who don’t necessarily share the same values as me or
Nussbaum. Many of the capabilities Nussbaum lists are prohibited by religion; therefore
the opportunity is not there for many women to practice these capabilities.
Many civilizations follow a patriarchy; this often alludes to women having less
freedom and rights than men. This also means that if you are living in that
civilization as a woman, you might not think you need the opportunity to these
capabilities in order to live a valuable happy life. For example the capability
of bodily integrity, you should be able to move freely from place to place. Yet
in Saudi Arabia women are not aloud to leave the country or travel without the
consent of her father. Yet that might not be a factor that is making her life
“less happy” it could just be practicing her religion. Yet if my dad prohibited
me from traveling it would make me less fulfilled because I find happiness through
seeing the world. This is called cross culture difference, because different
cultures give different answers to moral questions.
Nussbaum realizes that this is a criticism
of her list of capabilities. Yet she states that we are too focused on the
importance of different cultures that we are ignoring or denying moral
evaluation. “Women belong to cultures. But they do not choose to be born into
any particular culture, and they do not really choose to endorse its norms as
good for themselves, unless they do so in possession of further options and opportunities (Nussbaum, 54)”
I agree with this response. Although I do respect different cultures and
religions I find it hard to believe that all woman in these religions are happy
or fulfilled, because many are scared and muted. Nussbaum is looking out for
these people specifically and that is why she emphasizes the opportunity to practice these capabilities, and as it stands now
not all women have the ability to make a choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment