In Michael Kimmel and Gloria
Steinem’s “’Yes’ Is Better Than ‘No’” they speak of there needing to be a
change in the grays area between “yes” and “no”. If a person explicitly says
“no” and still encounter sexual activities, they are considered being raped.
The gray area is if there is neither a “yes” or “no” being said. If nothing is
being said it does not automatically mean “yes”. The Senate Bill 967 in
California tries to change this gray area in college campuses because the only
way sex is consensual is if both partners mutually agree (it can’t be implied,
there has to be verbal communication).
I
agree that there needs to be a dramatic change on the gray areas between “yes”
and “no”, especially on college campuses. Just because a person does not say
“no” certainly does not mean they want sex. Just because a person is
intoxicated and they physically are not capable if explicitly saying “no” does
not mean that they are inviting someone to come and assault them. What is most interesting about this article
is the backfire that was given when talked about there needing to be a verbal
consent. According to Charlton Heston “at Antioch College in Ohio, young men seeking
intimacy with a coed must get verbal permission at each step of the process
from kissing to petting to final copulation- all clearly spelled out in a
printed college directive”. As shocking as it is to see that an educated,
well-respected man could take “yes” means “yes” as a joke, it is not
surprising. It is even more interesting that this speech was given at Harvard
University. Harvard University is known to not punish students who have
sexually assaulted other students. In The
Hunting Ground a woman was sexually assaulted and got the assaulter kicked
out of school. Without her knowing, Harvard University overturned the appeal
and let him back in school. Like many other people in this world, people are
having a hard time agreeing that silence does not mean they are consenting.
People say “if the person did not want it, they could have said ‘no’”. A male
stated “If I have to ask those questions, I won’t get what I want”. I have two
arguments for that statement: number one is if you have a feeling that it is
potentially morally wrong, how could one risk that? Number two would be that
people like to hear the word “yes”. The word “yes” brings reassurance and it
makes people want to do more acts, you never have to question if they are
enjoying their time.
Society’s
view on the gray area between “yes” and “no” needs to be changed. The Senate
Bill 967 in California is a start but there needs to be more progression on
college campuses. This can happen by bringing more knowledge that silence does
not mean “yes”.
No comments:
Post a Comment